This is a working overview of HPLC, written for readers who want more than a one-paragraph summary but less than a textbook.
Reviewed 2025-10-28. Anything still debated is marked as such rather than presented as settled.
Measuring glutathione in biological samples requires attention to oxidation and matrix effects. High-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet or fluorescence detection can separate reduced and oxidized forms after derivatization. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry offers higher specificity and can quantify glutathione alongside related thiols. Because glutathione can oxidize during sample handling, many protocols use rapid acidification with metaphosphoric acid or sulfosalicylic acid. Internal standards help correct for losses during extraction and analysis.
Enzymatic recycling assays provide a complementary approach for total glutathione. In these methods, glutathione reductase reduces oxidized glutathione while a thiol-reactive reagent, such as 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid), produces a colored product. The reaction cycles between reduced and oxidized forms, amplifying the signal. Spectrophotometric or fluorometric detection can then estimate concentration. Distinguishing reduced glutathione from glutathione disulfide often requires separate aliquots, masking agents, or chromatographic separation, and the choice affects reported values.
Measuring glutathione requires attention to oxidation during sample handling, because GSH in biological samples can convert to GSSG or form mixed disulfides with proteins after collection. Acidic extraction, rapid cooling, and chelating agents are commonly used to limit such changes. Analytical methods usually distinguish free reduced glutathione, total glutathione, and protein-bound forms. Because these forms have different stability and reactivity, reported values depend heavily on the preparation protocol. No single preparation is universally suitable for every biological matrix or analytical goal.
Several techniques are used for quantification. Enzymatic recycling assays rely on glutathione reductase and a colorimetric or fluorescent readout, offering sensitivity for total glutathione. High-performance liquid chromatography can separate GSH from GSSG and other thiols, often with UV, fluorescence, or electrochemical detection. Mass spectrometry provides structural confirmation and can quantify low-abundance species when paired with separation. Each approach has trade-offs in specificity, throughput, and equipment requirements, so method selection depends on the research question and available instrumentation.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Solid storage temperature | -20 °C | Desiccated, protected from light |
| Solution stability | Hours to days at neutral pH | Acidic pH and low oxygen slow oxidation |
| Oxidized form | Glutathione disulfide (GSSG) | Formed by thiol oxidation |
| Typical analytical method | LC-MS/MS or enzymatic recycling | Choice depends on matrix and specificity |
| Thiol pKa | Approximately 9.2 | Influences reactivity at physiological pH |
Common analytical approaches include enzymatic recycling assays, high-performance liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry. The enzymatic recycling assay uses glutathione reductase and a colorimetric or fluorometric reagent to amplify signal, which gives good sensitivity for total glutathione. Chromatographic methods can separate GSH from GSSG and related thiols, while mass spectrometry offers structural confirmation and multiplexing. Each approach has different requirements for calibration, internal standards, and validation. No single method captures every form of glutathione in every matrix.
Storage recommendations for glutathione reagents usually specify a cool, dry, dark environment because the thiol oxidizes in air and light. Solid material is often kept desiccated at low temperature, while solutions are prepared fresh or stored frozen in aliquots. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles can accelerate degradation, and metal ions can catalyze oxidation. Quality control may include purity assays, water content, and identity confirmation. Stability limits are method-specific, so a stated shelf life applies only to defined conditions and packaging.
Quantifying glutathione requires distinguishing GSH from GSSG and preventing oxidation during sample preparation. Common approaches include the enzymatic recycling assay, often called the Tietze method, which measures total glutathione after converting GSSG to GSH. HPLC with ultraviolet or fluorescence detection and LC-MS/MS can separate and quantify both forms, sometimes after derivatization of the thiol group. Blood, plasma, and tissue samples differ in matrix and baseline concentrations, so method validation must account for recovery, linearity, and interference. No single assay is universally standard.
Glutathione is most stable as a dry powder stored cool and dry, but its thiol group is readily oxidized in solution. Aqueous preparations at neutral or alkaline pH lose GSH faster because the thiolate form reacts with dissolved oxygen and metal ions. Acidic conditions, chelating agents, and oxygen exclusion can slow oxidation, while repeated freeze-thaw cycles promote degradation. Light exposure and trace metals also contribute to loss. Laboratories typically validate stability for their own matrices because degradation rates depend on pH, temperature, concentration, and container materials.
Commercial glutathione is available in research-grade, food-grade, and supplement-grade forms, and purity specifications differ accordingly. Certificates of analysis commonly report identity by nuclear magnetic resonance or mass spectrometry, purity by HPLC, residual solvents, and heavy metals. Reference standards with assigned purity support calibration, while isotopically labeled glutathione can serve as an internal standard for mass spectrometry. For supplements, label claims may not be independently verified, and regulatory oversight varies by country. Verification often involves third-party testing for identity, potency, and contaminants.
== Neutron poisoning == A reactor can be unintentionally "shut down" by having an excess of neutron poisons in the reactor vessel. Neutron poisons are chemical byproducts of the nuclear reaction which absorb neutrons, lowering reactivity in the reactor and potentially stalling the reaction if enough poisons are allowed to build up. An example of this would be the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, when Reactor No. 4 suffered from a serious xenon-135 poisoning, which pushed the reactor into an unstable condition which later caused the accident. While neutron poisoning is not considered a shutdown in and of itself, it often requires that the reactor be shut down while the poisons are flushed from the system, as they can destabilise the reactor and cause it to behave unpredictably. Certain reactors, such as the CANDU reactor design (where it is called EPIS, or Emergency Poison Injection System), employ this phenomenon as part of their SCRAM procedure. When a SCRAM occurs, neutron poisons are injected into the reactor to immediately lower the reactivity of the reactor, at the same time or slightly prior to other shutdown mechanisms, such as control rods.
=== Gastrointestinal === CCK is synthesized and released by enteroendocrine cells in the mucosal lining of the small intestine (mostly in the duodenum and jejunum), called I cells, neurons of the enteric nervous system, and neurons in the brain. It is released rapidly into the circulation in response to a meal. The greatest stimulator of CCK release is the presence of fatty acids and/or certain amino acids in the chyme entering the duodenum. In addition, release of CCK is stimulated by monitor peptide (released by pancreatic acinar cells), CCK-releasing protein (via paracrine signalling mediated by enterocytes in the gastric and intestinal mucosa), and acetylcholine (released by the parasympathetic nerve fibers of the vagus nerve). Once in the circulatory system, CCK has a relatively short half-life.
In materials science, a disappearing polymorph is a form of a crystal structure (a morph) that is suddenly unable to be produced, instead transforming into a different crystal structure with the same chemical composition (a polymorph) during nucleation. Sometimes the resulting transformation is extremely hard or impractical to reverse, because the new polymorph may be more stable. That is, they are metastable forms that have been replaced by more stable forms. It is hypothesized that contact with a single microscopic seed crystal of the new polymorph can be enough to start a chain reaction causing the transformation of a much larger mass of material. Widespread contamination with such microscopic seed crystals may lead to the impression that the original polymorph has "disappeared". In a few cases, such as progesterone and paroxetine hydrochloride, the disappearance gradually spread across the world, and it is suspected that it is because Earth's atmosphere has over time become permeated with tiny seed crystals. It is believed that seeds as small as a few million molecules (about 10−15 grams) are sufficient for converting one morph to another, making unwanted disappearance of morphs particularly difficult to prevent. It is hypothesized that "unintentional seeding" may also be responsible for a related phenomenon, where a previously difficult-to-crystallize compound becomes easier to crystallize over time.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
4-Hydroxyatomoxetine, the major active metabolite of atomoxetine in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers, has been found to have sub-micromolar affinity for opioid receptors, acting as an antagonist at the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and as a partial agonist at the κ-opioid receptor (KOR). The affinities (IC50Tooltip half-maximal inhibitory concentration) of 4-hydroxyatomoxetine were 164 nM for the MOR, 88 nM for the KOR, 1,490 nM for the δ-opioid receptor (DOR), and >5,000 nM for the nociceptin receptor (ORL-1). Atomoxetine itself showed dramatically lower affinities (e.g., 25- to 50-fold). It is not known whether the actions of 4-hydroxyatomoxetine at the opioid receptors leads to CNS-related adverse effects with atomoxetine. Atomoxetine does not alter locomotor activity in rodents, in contrast to stimulants like amphetamine. In addition, atomoxetine does not produce self-administration in monkeys, also in contrast to stimulants like amphetamine. The drug does not produce stimulant-like effects, euphoria, or reinforcing effects in humans, instead increasing negative and unpleasant ratings at the highest assessed doses. Atomoxetine has been found to increase cortisol levels in humans.
Apixaban, sold under the brand name Eliquis among others, is an anticoagulant medication used to treat and prevent blood clots and to prevent stroke in people with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation through directly inhibiting factor Xa. It is used as an alternative to warfarin to prevent blood clots following hip or knee replacement and in those with a history of prior clots and does not require monitoring by blood tests or dietary restrictions. It is taken by mouth. Common side effects include bleeding and nausea. Other side effects may include bleeding around the spine and allergic reactions. Use is not recommended during pregnancy or breastfeeding. Use appears to be relatively safe in those with mild kidney problems. Compared to warfarin it has fewer interactions with other medications. It is a direct factor Xa inhibitor. In 2007, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb began the development of apixaban as an anticoagulant. Apixaban was approved for medical use in the European Union in May 2011, and in the United States in December 2012. It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines. In 2023, it was the 28th most commonly prescribed medication in the United States, with more than 19 million prescriptions. It is available as a generic medication, although not in the United States.
== External links == Curcumin (Curcuma, Turmeric) and Cancer (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version Medicines containing turmeric or curcumin, risk of liver injury, Safety advisory First draft statement on the potential risk to human health of turmeric and curcumin
== B == Bacillus Bacillus anthracis Bacillus brevis Bacillus cereus Bacillus fusiformis Bacillus licheniformis Bacillus megaterium Bacillus mycoides Bacillus stearothermophilus Bacillus subtilis Bacillus thuringiensis Bacteroides Bacteroides fragilis Bacteroides gingivalis Bartonella Bartonella henselae Bartonella quintana (formerly Rickettsia quintana) Bordetella Bordetella bronchiseptica Bordetella parapertussis Bordetella pertussis Borrelia burgdorferi Brucella Brucella abortus Brucella melitensis Brucella suis Burkholderia Burkholderia mallei Burkholderia pseudomallei Burkholderia cepacia
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Chromatographic methods can separate the two forms before detection. Enzymatic assays often measure total glutathione first and then use a separate procedure to estimate the oxidized fraction. The difference between total and oxidized amounts provides an indirect estimate of the reduced form.
Acidification lowers pH and slows thiol oxidation during handling. It also helps precipitate proteins that could interfere with detection. Typical choices include metaphosphoric acid and sulfosalicylic acid.
Dissolved oxygen reacts with the thiol group, forming glutathione disulfide. Neutral and alkaline conditions generally increase the oxidation rate. Light, metal ions, and repeated freezing and thawing can also reduce stability.
Common methods include enzymatic recycling assays, liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry. Many protocols separate reduced glutathione from its oxidized disulfide form before detection.